It is therefore alarming, but not surprising, that this word flows as readily from Newsom’s mouth as the R-word rolls off of Trump’s tongue. It is a throwback to racist and eugenics discourse of the early 20th century, and should be alarming to the disability community.
Recent
The article: Disability rights advocacy must never overlook the individual’s needs
Our BS meters should be going off whenever people use anecdotal evidence or single case studies to advocate for broad changes in policy, especially when those arguments are ableist and pro-forced treatment.
The article: Nearly 40% of Stanford undergraduates claim they’re disabled. I’m one of them
While privileged white students like Johnson may think they are “gaming the system” at Stanford by misusing accommodations, the truth is that places like Stanford will always bend over backwards and provide the resources to retain the most privileged students and keep them happy.
The article: Defending “the Disabled”
Given that Black people are disproportionately harmed by mass incarceration, and given that diversion programs disproportionately help people of higher socioeconomic status or greater privilege, this argument of diversion for some types of people but not for others, must be viewed as racist.
The article: Woman ‘overwhelmed’ by loneliness killed herself and disabled daughter, coroner says
The Guardian | Robyn Vinter | January 16, 2026
The article: GOP Cuts Will Cripple Medicaid Enrollment, Warns CEO of Largest Public Health Plan
KFF Health News | Bernard J. Wolfson | January 15, 2026









