The reality I see on the ground is that most students seeking support truly need it. For some, asking for the help they are legitimately qualified for feels embarrassing or nerve-racking, and I worry how this newly heightened scrutiny will harm those who struggle to advocate for themselves.
In Other News
VT Digger | Burlington pays $150,000 settlement over police treatment of Black teen with disabilities
“We have spent five years fighting to hold Burlington accountable for the harm their officials caused my child, but we can’t make changes alone,” Austrian said, according to a statement in an ACLU press release. “If you in the community want to ensure other families won’t have to endure this kind of pain and lasting trauma, it’s now up to you to raise your voice and seek changes to this deeply flawed system.”
The Guardian | New study casts doubt on reliability of mental health diagnosis interviews
Laura Duncan, a psychiatry professor at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, and one of the study’s authors, said diagnostic interviews are “often treated as a ‘gold standard’ for assessing mental disorders in both clinical settings and research”, but pointed out that these interviews fall short of providing a “definitive benchmark that demonstrates excellent validity and reliability”.
The Press Democrat | A Medi-Cal lifeline keeps Californians at home. Now it faces cut
Scott is among roughly 900,000 disabled Californians and older adults who rely on In-Home Supportive Services, a Medi-Cal program that pays caregivers to help people stay in their homes. Now, the program faces pressure from two directions: the Trump administration plans to defer $1.34 billion in federal matching funds while Gov. Gavin Newsom is proposing state budget changes that advocates say would shrink access and shift new costs to counties.
Deutsche Welle | SSRI antidepressants are often ‘carelessly prescribed’
In about one-third of cases, the first SSRI a person tries will not help them. Trying a second type of SSRI may help, but in 70-80% of cases they are ineffective.
The Times | Amateur sleuth exposes basic blunder in scores of cancer studies
His latest findings raise fresh questions about the reliability of published science. Some of the teams involved reported that their experiments had worked, despite apparently using a substance that should not have been capable of producing the results they claimed.













